Building Your Band

A better conversation about music, with David Loftis and Peter Bulanow

  • BLOG
    • Start Here
    • Then Read This
    • Esoteric
    • Piano
    • Keyboard
    • Guitar
    • Bass
    • Drums
    • Production
    • Sound Engineer
  • PODCAST
    • iTunes
    • Stitcher
    • SoundCloud
  • Intuitive Keys
  • CONNECT

Gavin Morris | Never Really Said Anything

January 25, 2016 By Pete Bulanow

Gavin MorrisAs the frontman and lead songwriter of Break The Fall, Gavin walks us through the process of creating their latest EP “The Wanderers“. From the preproduction writing, to choosing a producer, to packing up a van and driving eight hours to Nashville to record, it’s fantastic to hear the intentionality behind their creation.

Break The Fall: Website | Facebook | Twitter | Reverb Nation | Youtube | iTunes | Amazon

Produced by Lester Estelle II Website | Facebook | Twitter | Wikipedia

Mixed and Mastered by Robert Venable: Website | Facebook | Twitter | Wikipedia

Brandon‘s Cassette Preview/Teaser:

Song writers, musicians, band leaders, worship team members etc. . . Look at what instruments you have to work with on your team. Your guitar player doesn’t always have to play all the time, every song, start to finish. There doesn’t always have to be a lead guitar player noodling lead lines and melody riffs. Learn to tell them to lay out a section (Guitarists-learn to be ok with not playing and being told to lay out from time to time, it will make what you DO play sound more important.) Use every instrument on stage to build some diversity in your songs. And start finding new instruments to use to freshen things up. You have options; start experimenting on how to utilize your team members and not just one instrument. Also, dynamics still matter. Learn how soft and full you can really play and actually utilize it when the show/service/performance starts. Retention matters.
Posted by Gavin Morris

Kings Kaleidoscope (iTunes | Amazon) has Trombone in it!

For King and Country (iTunes | Amazon) ha Horn Players!

Who else should we know about who uses non-traditional instruments? Please post in the comments!

Subscribe on iTunes or Stitcher

Filed Under: Podcast Tagged With: BreakTheFall, Drums, Inspiration, LessisMore, Nashville, Production, Recording, Season2, Simplicity

Steven Kristopher | 40th Birthday Gift

December 10, 2015 By Pete Bulanow

With Abandon CD CoverSteven Krisopher shares what was behind his most recent project, With Abandon, (edit: released December 15th, 2015). With sixty minutes of music in ten songs, he talks about how his desire for this project was to let the songs breathe.

Primarily a pianist, Steven wrote this project on the acoustic guitar and did a textbook rock keyboard/piano treatment, after programming the drums and bass himself. Lots of vocal tracks unite the songs, sung by him and four other vocalists (one of which we talk about in particular). He then mixed and mastered the album, and edited the official video.

Keep up with him at his website: StevenKristopher.com, and follow him at Twitter and on Facebook.

Check out his music on iTunes and Bandcamp – and “With Abandon” is out!

Find this podcast on iTunes or Stitcher and subscribe. If you enjoyed this episode, please support this podcast with a rating and comment.

Filed Under: Podcast Tagged With: Album, Drum Programming, Keyboards, Old School, Piano, Production, Season2, Songwriter

Remote GLS Stage Geometry

December 7, 2015 By Pete Bulanow

Mountain Range with logo

Recently we had the opportunity to play music live for a remote Global Leadership Summit event (ours was in Jamaica). 2015-10-22 10.50.18When we arrived, the stage was being built (right) and preparations had been made for a high quality rear projection screen, but there was no stage design for the band. We were only told we needed to stay out of line-of-site of the screen. This of course makes sense; the video presentation needs to be center stage, as it’s the main event and the band needs to work around that. However, with the particular stage geometry we were presented with, that was difficult, and sub-optimal. My sense is, there are ways to do this that are better than others. Perhaps Willow Creek has published some best practices and I just haven’t seen them, but in their absence, I thought I would offer some thoughts to get this conversation started.

Let’s start with the guidance that Willow offers (page 3):

Video Screen Philosophy

A single big, bright center screen is nearly always critical in the success of the Global Leadership Summit. Even the most sophisticated churches and conference rooms do not typically have the type of installed projection equipment required to keep the audience’s focus for two entire days (with nearly all of the content being presented by video).

Remember to place the screen as far downstage as possible—while still giving you room for the band, vocalists, facilitator or host. Placing the screen too far upstage will put too much space between the on-screen speaker and your audience.

Keeping the screen as close to the audience as possible will also result in a larger apparent screen size.

So there is a lot of good guidance here.

2015-10-24 12.35.55

The way our stage was designed, it was difficult for the band to work effectively and connect with the congregation. We had a very deep stage which forced the band to the back to preserve line-of-sight to the projector. This resulted in much of the stage going unused and did not place either the screen or the band “as close to the audience as possible“.

Remote GLS Stage Design-2


A shallow stage would be a much better option (below). This would allow a rear-projection screen to be much closer to the audience, and the presence of the band would be greatly improved.

Remote GLS Stage Design-3


Even better would be putting the screen in front of the band (below). This would of course require front projection and a retractable screen. It would offer a flawless transition in and out of music. The screen could be partially dropped to display the top line of lyrics.Remote GLS Stage Design-4


A traditional stage design would be most comfortable to the band, to include putting the drums and bass, and possibly even the keyboardist on risers (as below). This could again be accomplished with a front-screen projection and a retractable screen.Remote GLS Stage Design-5

If you have any experience with playing / hosting a remote GLS, I’d love to have you chime in with your thoughts about what works and what doesn’t work. Here are my google slides, which you are free to use, and improve upon! I’ll happily grant you access to edit them as well (upon request). If there are other ideas I missed, or some detail I overlooked, please contact me with that information,  and I will update this post, or just leave a comment below.

Thanks!

Filed Under: Blog Tagged With: Band, esoteric, Global Leadership Summit, GLS, GLS15, meltingearth, WillowCreek

Apple and Alchemy

November 23, 2015 By Pete Bulanow

MainstageBYBAs a keyboardist and Apple aficionado who follows the likes of Gruber, Marco and Dalrymple, the acquisition of the soft synth, Alchemy, by Apple last year, and its recent re-release in Logic and MainStage, presents a unique opportunity to look at exactly what Apple has done with this acquisition. The improvements in design and functionality are what you might hope for from Apple. But it’s the reason for the acquisition that is perhaps the most interesting. Apple has a huge piggy bank; they rarely use it for acquisition. That they did use it must signal something strategic.


Background

Camel Audio announced their store was closed on Jan 7th of this year (2015). Dalrymple posted about this back in the day and called it a good move (don’t miss the speculations in the comments!). Camel Audio maintained customer support until July 7, 2015, and customers were encouraged to download the latest versions of the software and backup their data. Which I did. Twice. Today camelaudio.com doesn’t resolve and they’ve even deleted their youtube channel.

GarageBand, essentially a consumer grade Digital Audio Workstation (DAW), introduced the idea of a softsynth, i.e. “software synth” or “virtual instrument”, to the masses with minimal fanfare. Before GarageBand, softsynths, which first debuted in 1999, were reserved for professional or prosumer musicians who used them to add to their sonic pallet inside of a host DAW (like the big three: Cakewalk, Cubase, or Logic). Using softsynths greatly reduced the complexity of tracking keyboard parts in a MIDI sequencer DAW. Doing everything inside the computer means there is no gain structure to manage and no loss of fidelity. Audio can stay in the digital domain and be processed with 32bit fidelity to minimize rounding errors.  Softsynths were also cost effective, as you didn’t need to re-buy hardware. Eventually that sonic pallet became attractive to live gigging, although the threat of a crash and reboot always loomed large. With the creation of MainStage (at just $30), a lightweight host for softsynths specifically created for live environments, softsynths became a staple of modern keyboard gigging.

camelaudio-1.8.2014-498x292One of those softsynths that I considered a secret weapon both live and in my studio was “Alchemy” by Camel Audio. It was relatively light on the CPU, but strong on evocative sound. Producer, DJ, Technologist, and “Father of Trance” BT described it as “… the best synth I have ever used in my entire life. Hard or soft synth, the most elegant, animated, beautiful, evocative synthesizer ever made.” That’s no small praise. BT is Berkley trained, has conducted live orchestras, and since then even produced his own software plugin based on his “stutter edit” style – so that is not a resource-constrained compliment. Alchemy is world class.

A point of clarification- Mac Observer reported that “Apple Adds Alchemy Synthesizer Support to Logic Pro X,” but this isn’t quite correct. Logic, as well as many other DAWs, could already host any range of softsynths, to include Alchemy via a plugin standard called VST or AU. For example, Cubase made a point of explaining how Alchemy integrated back in the day. With Apple’s acquisition, everyone else actually lost access to Alchemy because Apple has not released it as a standalone product on the VST or AU standards. Instead, it is now locked away inside Apple products. I initially looked at this acquisition and its significance through the lens of MainStage, but the more I’ve thought about it, this might be more of a move for Logic. But before we get into all that, let’s talk about Alchemy.


Intro to Alchemy Softsynth

Below is what the most updated version of Alchemy looked like before Camel Audio shut off the lights, and is what Apple received (plus whatever else Camel Audio had cooking in the back room).

Instead of employing DRM (which often impacts usability) to protect their software, Camel Audio took a different tack and baked the user’s name right into the owner’s version of the software. The owner’s name is shown in two places, once under the logotype “Alchemy,” and the second upon startup in the “LED panel” in the center. In fact, when you first run the synth, this LED panel displays not only your name, but your phone number and address – basically all your support information. I imagine this did a pretty good job of dissuading folks from sharing their personal copy of the synth without saddling honest users with flaky authentication, an approach which strikes me as Apple-ey.

CamelAlchemyAdvancedBYB2

A couple key points to understanding this display:

To the right of the Alchemy Logotype there are three buttons: “Browse, Simple, and Advance” indicating three modes for interacting with the synth. The default mode (highlighted in blue) is “Browse” (pictured above), the purpose of which is to help with finding the right sound. This is typically the start of the keyboardist’s workflow.

AbsynthBYBToday’s keyboard workstations and softsynths usually have hundreds, if not thousands, of sounds on board. Indeed, Camel Alchemy shipped with 5GB of samples and over 1,000 sounds. With this many sounds it became possible to spend hours or even days searching for sounds and not actually doing any music (I’m not making this up. This was discussed in Keyboard magazine, and I was guilty of it myself!). Thus navigating and finding the right sound is a problem of significant importance. Camel Audio thoughtfully approached this issue by tagging all their sounds and letting the user select (top row) various categories, genres, or sound types to filter results (second row) displayed as sound names. I don’t know if Camel Audio was the first to use this tag/filter approach to find sounds (e.g. legendary heavyweight Absynth also does this, at right), but this approach works extremely well. Additionally, when selected, Alchemy displays a graphic of the sound library where the sound came from, a shout-out to the author, and a place to save user tags and user comments as well. Finally, Alchemy uses a five-star rating system for each sound (again, very apple-ey) with the default value set to three stars, which I find useful.

The third row exposes some rapid sound editing parameters as well as some macro sound editing parameters that are among the best implementation of these ideas that I’ve seen. First, there are two X/Y “joystick” controllers connected to a variety of parameters. Although this approach is not without precedent, it’s a useful one. One of the most compelling and original features of Alchemy is the eight zones in the bottom right. With a mouse or other X-Y controller(s) you can move around in this area and smoothly fade from one set of parameters to another. Getting a keyboard to change parameters without glitching (or typically “zipping”) while playing notes is, I-don’t-know-how-to-put-this-but-kind-of-a-big-deal, and is essential to the “playability” of the synth. Using these eight zones in real time facilitate playing the parameters themselves, modifying the timbre, adding depth to the sound.

Alchemy Today

Now that we have looked at Legacy Alchemy, let’s see what Apple did to the front panel, while in the same default browse mode:

AppleAlchemyAdvancedBYB2

Clean. Familiar. Somehow bigger. I really like it. They didn’t mess it up. Basically everything is intact. That’s a lot of restraint on Apple’s part.

WithDescriptionsThe only addition I see is that in some sounds (not a majority though), there are labels written in the eight zones instead of just numbering them (see right). This could be helpful to remind you what that zone sounds like, or to help you to avoid a zone. Typically I like about five of the eight zones and really want to avoid one or two.

The thing that I see missing is a little graphic and credit to the author of the sound bank that the sound comes from, but that was probably more important in the past and not relevant to Apple’s business model, as we will see. The user tags and comments area remain intact, as does the five star rating with the default set at three stars. It’s really interesting to me that Apple kept the default at a three star rating, since they also use a five star system in iTunes and iPhoto, but the default there is no stars. This is a little non-standard for Apple.


Let’s look at the simple mode from the Legacy synth:

This mode assumes you’ve found your sound and want to save screen real estate. It has just the real-time performance parameters on it you need to leverage this synth.

CamelAlchemySimpleBYB

OK, Apple’s take:

AppleAlchemySimpleBYB

Once again, everything is intact. Just a much cleaner more logical design – better in every way.

The design has less skeuomorphic cues – the graduations on the buttons and the diagonals on the joystick are gone – although the metaphor of buttons, knobs and zones remain intact for keyboardists who may actually map these parameters to real-world physical interfaces (I certainly have/do).


Let’s take a look at the Advanced Mode, meant to expose all the parameters to the no-kidding sound-programmers and sound-tweakers out there (as modifying the default sounds, if only a little, is a must for any “legit” keyboardist).

CamelAlchemyAdvancedBYB

Lots of skeuomorphic textures and indentations are present, as well as recessed areas to group controls.

Ok, Apple’s redesign:

AppleAlchemyAdvancedBYB

Again, this design is better in every way. Perhaps the most obvious improvement is actually drawing out (in ORANGE!) the “Attack, Decay, Sustain, Release” or ADSR loudness envelope that each note pressed on a keyboard will follow. Seeing this makes me wonder why on earth this wasn’t done in the original version; it’s that obvious of an oversight in past versions.

This is the only place we see this color of orange. Before this, blue was the accent color over a greyscale panel. Here a new color is introduced, and it’s used to map any control that may impact the note envelope (e.g. other gain controls). It’s a bit unusual to see a color in only one place, kind of like a font used only once, but in my opinion the use of a new color is warranted because the envelope is a singularly critical part of the sound, and there are a handful of parameters that impact it. Designating those with this new color adds clarity.

Upgrade Summary

As a lover of this synth who is emotionally invested in it’s ongoing success, I really am relieved to see it lives again, wasn’t destroyed, wasn’t “simplified” into a consumer product, didn’t have its paradigm changed (e.g. FCP), still looks familiar, and quite honestly is looking better than ever.

The sound (timbre) of the current release is exactly the same as the legacy version. It’s fun to see all the knobs in all the same positions making the same sounds, but with a flatter (there I said it) user interface.

I would be surprised if there is a single keyboardist out there who wouldn’t clearly view this as an improvement.


Dollars and Sounds

When Camel Audio sold this synth, it went for $249 US and it came with a nice default set of samples and sounds (5GB of samples and over 1,000 sounds). But that default set of sounds could be expanded with additional libraries of sounds that Camel Audio continued developing (at ~ $59 each). This kept the synth fresh and relevant to whatever genres you were currently exploring, and kept funds flowing in to Camel.

This is a business model that Apple could have followed, but discarded. It appears to me that all or many of the sound libraries are included for free in the current version of Alchemy, which again, costs the consumer nothing. It’s just a free update. Apple’s version of Alchemy comes with 3,000 thousands. and 14 GB of content, if you download it all. These are probably the best of all the expansion libraries, which when bundled was an $850 synth.AdditionalContentBYB

Apple likely didn’t drop “Apple Money” to purchase this synth, but they dropped some significant coin on a well-researched fit to serve both MainStage and Logic. By well-researched I mean, there are a lot of softsynths out there that put an extensive load on your CPU. That’s fine in the studio with Logic where it is OK to render out a complex softsynth part in even longer than real time and “freeze” that audio rendered out. But MainStage is a different application. It needs sound to be computed in real-time (typically < 10ms), so anything it can’t compute in that period of time means clicks, glitches, noise, and hung notes, none of which is tolerable. Alchemy serves the interests of both MainStage and Logic, because it has so much sonic goodness and is light on the CPU.

Apple knew what they were doing. They took a great product, and made multiple products better – and significantly so (it’s even in GarageBand). Honestly, I’m both floored and relieved by this. In my mind, this is a textbook example of an acquisition done right.

★★★★★ for the Alchemy team.


Strategic Analysis

If Gruber has taught us anything, it’s that Apple’s priorities are #1) Apple, #2) the consumer and #3) developers, in that order. So let’s take a look at how these priorities align and guess some of the reasons behind this acquisition.

This is an obvious win for MainStage, which is now a simply breathtaking deal at $30. You could spend a grand or two for a hardware synth and not be this sonically flexible or ugpradable. But with that money, purchasing Apple hardware starts making sense. So Apple might actually win some new hardware purchases, while the consumer would seem to be assured that Apple wants to continue to be the platform of choice for music production. outputBYBDevelopers can still develop synths for MainStage, but they better up their game. Heavyweights Native Instruments and Spectrosonics are competitive, but they can also bring a Macbook Pro to its knees in a live environment. You’re going to have to be out-of-the-box, someone like recent upstart Output with “reversed” or “pulsed” sounds (see right) to have something to say these days. I don’t know how you would go head to head with Alchemy.

The more I think though, MainStage might just be the “free candy” to get you hooked on Alchemy, so you have one more reason to buy into Logic. My DAW of choice is currently Cubase, and the more I think about it, I may also be their target audience.

Previously, a DAW might cost $700 new. Those prices have come down, Sternberg Cubase now goes for $550 and Cakewalk Sonar is $500. But Apple shook things up once they lowered the price of Logic to just $199 back in 2011. That is the price of an upgrade in Cubase! Additionally I’ve heard good things about the quality of Logic’s onboard effects, giving you less of a reason to spend money on 3d party software (I’ve spent thousands on Waves on reverbs and compressors!). With Alchemy included in Logic, sequestered away from the other DAWs, there is another compelling reason to make the move to Logic. If you’re a developer, I don’t know how you stay competitive at these prices. You’re going to have to think differently about the studio space (e.g. Ableton Live or Propellerhead’s Reason), or offer extremely high-end solutions (e.g. Protools), and those alternatives exist. But I think Apple wants to own the traditional MIDI-studio DAW space, and with their quality/cost it will be very hard to compete in this space.

I think this acquisition did two things. First it increased the value of the Apple platform for pro music, which is good news for everyone: Apple, Consumers and Developers. Secondly, I think Apple is playing chess with DAWs, and this is another attempt at a checkmate.

So you don’t have MainStage what are you waiting for? And if you’ll excuse me I’m off to buy Logic.

Filed Under: Blog Tagged With: Alchemy, Apple, AU, Cakewalk, Camel Audio, Cubase, DAW, Keyboard, Logic, MainStage, SoftSynth, Sonar, Steinberg, Virtual Instrument, VST

Jamaica 2015 Report

November 7, 2015 By Pete Bulanow

Friends and supporters of our music ministry trip to Jamaica –

Thank you for believing in us, and for helping to take this trip from a dream into reality. You must be wondering how things went, and I’d like to take some time to share some of the highlights of our trip with you.

2015-10-21 10.11.34-1

Our exciting jo2015-10-24 07.35.53urney not only met, but exceeded my expectations. I am deeply grateful for the talented team of musicians who took vacation, leaving their families and jobs, to offer themselves and their expertise to our Jamaican brothers and sisters. This team (of mostly introverts!) gelled together well and honored the individual gifts of one another.2015-10-22 10.50.18 Our schedule was packed, and taking on such a full trip with a bunch of introverted musicians was a trick. We arrived on Tuesday afternoon, and didn’t even get to walk onto the sandy beach across from where we were staying until the following Monday, the day before we left.

The pressure of our schedule was compounded when we lost 10 hours of rehearsal and soundcheck time our first morning together. We arrived at our scheduled time for our 10 AM sound check, and the stage wasn’t even put together! ….And so we had to relaxed our expectations and tried to vibe with the flow of island time. “It’s all OK, mon. Everithin’s gonna be alright!”


Our first task was to provide music for the Global Leadership Summit, hosted by Willow Creek. The mission of the Global Leadership Summit (held annually near Chicago at the Willow Creek church) is to better equip present and future leaders in the church for leadership.

Dave Falconer of jamaicalink.org

Dave Falconer of jamaicalink.org

Two Jamaican representatives attended this year’s actual #GLS15 at Willow and they selected the presentations they thought would be most applicable to the Jamaican audience. These were shown on a huge video screen, center stage. Our role as a team was to provide music and worship leading, playing some key songs after the music session and during the break.

2015-10-24 18.35.56While providing an opportunity for corporate worship, we had the dual role of “setting the bar”- showing what is possible – in a conference room full of Jamaican pastors and worship leaders. We didn’t take this as an opportunity to show off our individual proficiencies, but rather wanted to demonstrate how to serve the song, serve each other, and serve the congregation in creating space for corporate worship, modeling after Christ’s servant leadership.
The feedback we received was extremely positive. I spoke with the Willow Creek representative, Randy Johnson, with some ideas about stage design in this unique environment. He took that opportunity to comment that the quality of the music exceeded his expectations, which really warmed our hearts. When you pull together a group of extremely thoughtful and talented musicians, producers and worship leaders who all understand their role, and who have a heart to give their all to the worship experience, that’s not necessarily inevitable, but we’re very thankful for the synergy this group had.

2015-10-24 12.35.55


The second major part of our ministry was to host a full-featured music workshop for a number of churches near Montego Bay. This is the same curriculum we’ve been developing for more than a year now. We tried to let everyone see behind the curtain of how we do things as much as we could.

IMG_7544Here are some of the things we covered:

  • At the initial plenary session we discussed the big picture, explaining everyone’s roles.
  • We talked about the foundation: the drummer as time keeper and the bassist as the glue that ties the time to the harmonic content of the other instruments.
  • We talked a lot about “sonic space”. Acoustics at churches in Jamaica is a significant issue, as most seem to be highly reflective. So listening to how all the musicians play together to fill that space is paramount.
  • We also talked about the importance of the sound technician, the most underrated musician out there, but perhaps the most important.
  • We talked about the most visible musician – the lead vocal or worship leader – and the importance of modeling a melody that is singable, in a key that is singable.
  • Finally, we discussed how everyone in the band is serving the song and making space for the most important member – the congregation. Much of the excitement and energy of playing live comes from making space for the congregation to respond, even though we have no idea how they will respond or how the (or even if) the Spirit will move.

IMG_7546After talking theory for hours and taking questions and comments, we closed with a two-hour worship concert in which we participated in and demonstrated all the important principles we had been talking. This allowed people to clearly see how all the theory works in practice and illustrate how we choose to serve the song, serve each other, and serve the congregation. This final worship concert was probably the highlight of the entire trip for us, and the response was terrific.We were encouraged by the responsiveness of those who had attended our workshop. Their pastor (Duane Maden) came to us afterward and told us how much his community needed to hear what we had presented. Another person told us they had been to all the concerts in this church, and this one was by far the best they had attended.

We went to Jamaica thinking that we would be ministering, that we had much to give. But the result was that we received perhaps even more than we gave. It was so fulfilling to be part of the Global Leadership Summit there, and it was incredible to see the impact of the BYB curriculum on people’s understanding of how to do music. Certainly there are intrinsic obstacles to overcome in Jamaica, and certainly there is much more we could do, but we feel great about the connections that were made.

2015-10-27 08.42.43 HDR

Grace & Peace
Pete

Filed Under: Blog

John B Stanley | The Language of Heaven

September 28, 2015 By Pete Bulanow

John B Stanley

John B Stanley (Twitter, Reverb Nation, iTunes) challenges us to do better music in our services and gives us the behind-the-scenes story of his “Drum Spectacular”.

Also check out his post on this in Modern Drummer.

Along the way we discuss his influences, most especially Lee Ritenour (Wiki, iTunes, Amazon) with Omar Hakim (Wiki, iTunes), and Hans Zimmer (Wiki, iTunes, Amazon).

Without further ado – scored and produced by John B Stanley:

Find this podcast on iTunes or Stitcher.

edit: “O Holy Night” has been released on iTunes!

Filed Under: Podcast Tagged With: Drums, Instrumental, Musicianship, Production, Season2

New to Hymns

September 21, 2015 By Pete Bulanow

Taylor Carson

Taylor Carson

Whenever you rehearse a hymn, even one of the new hymn rearrangements, you quickly get a sense of whether the vocalist grew up singing out of hymnbook or not. Probably half the musicians I work with know them and probably half don’t. It seems to manifest somewhat like an accent – you either have that native accent, or you don’t. You either hit those special queues that aren’t exactly notated, or you don’t.

What I’d like to suggest is that not having that native hymn accent is not necessarily a liability in creating an arrangement, and can even work to be an advantage. Yes, it does take a little extra investment to nail down certain notes that you need for it to “still be the hymn”, but once you have that, someone new to the hymns can bring something fresh, something immediate, something a little raw and unpolished but emotionally relevant.

I recently had this experience. A friend introduced me to Taylor Carson by way of this video, and I knew I wanted to try something with him. It took about six months for the timing to work out, but I eventually got him into the studio to sing “Praise to the Lord, the Almighty” on a track I’d been experimenting with. Taylor didn’t grow up singing the hymns, but he was willing to put in a little extra work to get the essentials down as I heard them, and then was more than willing to put all his heart into a performance.

I absolutely love what we captured in the end. It felt fresh to me. It felt real. It felt raw. It felt so very honest. His take made me hear the hymn, and even the lyrics of the hymn, in a new way. Which is what I think we’re supposed to be doing with sacred music. (Psalm 33:3)

Please tell me what you think!

Available on iTunes | Spotify | Amazon | Google Play

Filed Under: Blog

Dave Tauler – Not Enough Bassoon Gigs

August 17, 2015 By Pete Bulanow

Youtube | Facebook | Twitter

Dave Tauler: Youtube | Facebook | Twitter

In this podcast episode, Dave talks to us about how playing wind instruments informs the way he approaches singing and composition, and warns us about how solo instruments can conflict with vocals. He then gives us his formula for using these instruments in a band setting, describing not only where to play but where not to play.

Along the way, we discuss the difference between Handel’s Messiah, Watermusic, and Fireworksmusic, as well as the difference between Bach’s Brandenburg Concertos and his St John Passion, and Dave gives a big shout out to the Bach Collegium Japan (Amazon | iTunes) version of the latter.

If you’ve ever wondered about how to incorporate note-readers into the (chart or ear-based) worship setting, this podcast is for you, as Dave gives practical steps toward this and points us toward the free notation software MuseScore 2.0.

Connect with Dave Tauler on Facebook, Youtube, and Twitter.

Subscribe to this podcast on iTunes & Stitcher

 

Filed Under: Podcast Tagged With: Brass, Production, Scoring, Season2, ServingtheSong, SoloInstruments, Story, Vocals, Woodwinds

Season 1 Remix | Kaleidoscope Edition

August 3, 2015 By Pete Bulanow

Taylor Carson

Taylor Carson

While recording and editing the first 18 episodes of the podcast, I began to notice some of the content commented on some of the other content. I began to think how awesome it might be to hear these ideas back-to-back, remixed into a super-episode, which would demonstrate both the importance of the ideas, as well as some of the different ways they’re approached. When my amazing wife suggested I do a “kaleidoscope” edition, I poured through all 18 episodes, finding clips to put together, resulting in this fascinating overview of Season 1.  Special thanks to all my guests who shared their quality content.

If you missed Season 1 of the Building Your Band podcast, this is a great way to catch up! It is also an invitation to go back and revisit specific episodes.

I would love to hear your comments right in the Soundcloud stream or below in the comments section. For all the episodes past and future, subscribe on iTunes or Stitcher!

Season 2 will be coming soon! Please contact me if you would like to be featured!

“Almighty“- Produced, Mixed & Mastered by Peter Bulanow | http://meltingearth.com

Featuring: Taylor Carson | http://taylorcarson.com
Additional Vocals:  Eileen Graham | http://eileengrahammusic.com
Cello: Michael Thomas | facebook.com/CelloMT
Bass: Aron “Teo” Lee | facebook.com/teo.lee

Special thanks to all the musicians for their collaboration, and to Dan Rebeiz (http://danieljackproductions.com) for his advice and mentorship.

Filed Under: Podcast Tagged With: Bass, BVGs, Community, Drums, Genres, Gospel, Guitar, LessisMore, Production, Season1, Vocals, Worship

Photoshopped Worship

June 8, 2015 By Pete Bulanow

Teo on Bass by Aaro Keipi

Teo on Bass by Aaro Keipi

You don’t have to spend much time on the web, let alone Facebook, before you come across an article on how Photoshopping (i.e. digitally altering) a picture has gone too far, how it creates unattainable standards of beauty, and/or how it is evil. Photography forums populated by the people who routinely use Photoshop will even agree and mock users who over-photoshop or worse do it poorly (e.g. three hands).

You can’t discuss music in the church for more than about two or three sentences before someone invokes the word “excellence“. Certainly our goal shouldn’t be do to things poorly, but how far are we willing to go it in the name of excellence. Is it possible to Photoshop a Worship experience, and is it possible to go too far with it? What happens if we slip up and allow people to see three hands (e.g. expose that we use backing tracks)?

Are we giving up anything in the name of excellence?

Where is the elusive line where things have gone “too far”?

While there are purists in any field who argue photoshop is an artistic compromise or even unartistic, I personally can’t get behind the purists. I think filters like the guitar pedals on The Edge’s guitar are part of his sound, part of his instrument, part of his art. Back in the film day, the dark room was part of the craft of photography. Today we have Lightroom and Photoshop, and these are arguably part of the craft of digital photography today. In fact, all my images on this blog were post-produced in photoshop, and if not photoshop, then lightroom.

In the audio world, would we ever suggest that mixing can occur without using compressors and equalization? Or if you’re a mixing engineer, that mastering is not a necessary part of the process of creating an album?

I think it may be helpful to understand something better by understanding it’s opposite. The opposite of “excellence” is sometimes framed as “inclusiveness”, as in the only thing keeping us from excellence is that we’re not being exclusive enough thus we’re allowing less talented folk to participate. While I understand this particular tension, I think another tension exists between “excellence” and “authenticity“.

We think it’s ok to use delay and equalization and compressors, but not as much pitch correction because we expect people to be able to sing on pitch.

The reality is that bad photoshopping, which I’ll generalize as “over-production” is an issue not just in church music, but in society as well. However the problem is compounded in the Christian context due to a pervasive perception of inauthenticity (via hypocritical moralizing or simply wearing a happy “fake” face).

I think it’s safe to say, we’ve seen production, we’ve seen over-production, and at this point there is a thirst for under-production if it provides for a genuine experience. Where we do use production techniques (and I do), we do ourselves and our message a favor to not overdo it.

Filed Under: Blog Tagged With: authenticity, excellence, overproduction, Photoshop

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Subscribe to the Podcast

Apple PodcastsAndroidby EmailRSS

Receive these blog posts in your inbox


 

Recent Comments

  • William Brew IV on Podcast Guest
  • Chordy on Podcast Guest
  • Aron Lee on Podcast Guest
  • Pete Bulanow on New to Hymns
  • Almighty on New to Hymns
  • Heather on New to Hymns
  • Worship // The Back Pew Perspective - Back Pew Baptist on Throw-away songs
  • Aarography on Aaro Keipi, ‘Keyboardists Agreeing’
  • BatmanBass on Aaro Keipi, ‘Keyboardists Agreeing’
  • Pete Bulanow on Making room for the bass

Tags

Arranging Band Bass BVGs Choir Composition Critique Drums esoteric Genres Gospel Guitar Harmony Inspiration Instruction Interpretation Jamaica Keyboard LessisMore Life Logic MainStage Math Missions Mix Musicianship Piano Prayer Production Quotes rhythm section Season1 Season2 ServingtheSong Sound Sound Engineer Space StartHere Tech TheFUnk ThenReadThis TimeSignature Vocals Worship Worship Leader
© meltingearth